Democrats Love Ukraine Except When a Ukrainian Woman Is Murdered by a Black Homeless Criminal

She didn’t die in a war zone. She died on American soil, in silence, under a system Democrats created.

She Fled a War. She Died on a Train.

Iryna Zarutska escaped a real war.
Not a rhetorical one. Not a hashtag campaign.
A war with bombs, tanks, and disappearing civilians.

She came to the United States believing it was safer. She made it out of Ukraine, but she did not survive America.

On August 22, she boarded a train in Charlotte. She sat quietly, headphones in, bothering no one. Moments later, she was dead, her throat slashed by a homeless repeat offender with a knife.

No argument. No interaction. No warning.
Three quick strikes. He walked away.

She didn’t die in a Russian air raid.
She died in a Democrat-run city, under a set of policies designed to excuse failure and release dysfunction back onto the streets in the name of compassion.

There was no compassion for her.
She was not protected. She was not avenged.
And the people responsible for the system that let it happen have nothing to say.

A Convenient Cause Until It Was Inconvenient

The American left did not just support Ukraine. They branded themselves with it.

When Russian tanks crossed the border in 2022, there was a wave of symbolic solidarity unlike anything seen in modern memory.
Members of Congress posed in front of blue and yellow banners.
Hollywood actors declared Ukraine the “front line of democracy.”
Corporations changed their logos, university buildings were lit in national colors, and TikTok influencers taught people how to pronounce “Zelensky” with reverence.

The public theater was constant.
At the 2022 Grammy Awards, the audience was interrupted with a televised plea from President Zelensky himself. In Washington, Nancy Pelosi draped herself in Ukrainian colors and called the war a “struggle for freedom everywhere.” Billions in military and humanitarian aid were fast-tracked with bipartisan approval, but it was Democrats who turned the moment into a kind of moral performance.

All of it came with the same message:
Ukraine represents the oppressed, and America must defend the oppressed at all costs.

But that message had a shelf life. And apparently, that shelf life expired the moment a Ukrainian woman was murdered by someone who represented the failure of progressive domestic policy.

Because when Iryna Zarutska was killed, not in a war zone, but in a city council-funded light rail car in North Carolina, the blue and yellow flags came down. The hashtags went quiet. The politicians who had once stood on the steps of Congress demanding we protect Ukrainians now had nothing to say about one who was killed right here at home.

Not even a tweet.

The woman who died wasn’t useful. That was the problem. Russians didn’t kill her. A border agent or a police officer didn’t kill her. She wasn’t the kind of refugee who helps build a case for open borders or asylum expansion.

She was white. She was quiet. She was killed by a Black, homeless, mentally ill repeat offender who had already been failed by the justice system, a man who, under the logic of progressive decarceration, was precisely where he was supposed to be: not behind bars.

And so, the silence came. Loud, deliberate, and instructive.

When the narrative works, victims become saints. They get murals, billboards, scholarships, and movements. But when the narrative threatens the foundation of progressive mythology, even the most vulnerable are discarded without ceremony.

• We’ve seen this before.
  When Mollie Tibbetts, a white college student, was murdered by an illegal immigrant in Iowa, progressives warned us not to “politicize her death.”

• When Kate Steinle was shot and killed by a five-times-deported felon in San Francisco, sanctuary city advocates doubled down.

• When Chesa Boudin’s policies in San Francisco led to a 567 percent increase in reported open-air thefts in Union Square, the media treated it as a curiosity, until voters recalled him.

These are not anomalies. They are signals.

Progressives are committed to defending the appearance of compassion. But they are rarely willing to confront the consequences of it.
The same ideology that demands we support Ukraine with no questions asked also requires that we ignore the violence happening in our own cities, mainly when their own policies produce that violence.

The data backs this up.
According to a 2023 report by the Council on Criminal Justice, homicides committed by homeless individuals in major urban transit systems rose by over 30 percent between 2019 and 2023. In cities with aggressive decarceration and diversion programs, like New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and yes, Charlotte, that number was even higher.

And yet, this is treated not as failure, but as progress.
Because to acknowledge the damage would require rethinking the entire framework, the very same one built on defunding police, decriminalizing vagrancy, and celebrating victimhood instead of enforcing order.

When Iryna died, she was not just murdered by a man with a knife.
She was sacrificed by a political class that values ideology over outcomes.

That is the real cause they stand for.
And it is not Ukraine.

Their Principles Are Conditional

The slogans are loud. The policies are celebrated. But the principles?
They are conditional.

Support for refugees sounds noble, until the refugee is white and murdered by someone on the left’s protected list.
Support for women sounds empowering, until the woman is not a Democrat, not a victim of patriarchy, but a casualty of progressive policy failure.
Support for the vulnerable sounds compassionate, until someone asks who made them vulnerable in the first place.

When it came to Iryna Zarutska, none of the usual rules applied.
There was no candlelight vigil. No press conference. No foundation in her name. No hashtags. No outrage.

Contrast that with how fast political actors mobilize when the roles are reversed, when the optics work.

In 2020, Breonna Taylor’s name was plastered on murals, buildings, banners, and NBA jerseys. Her face was printed on masks. Her death became a fundraising campaign for social justice nonprofits nationwide. Regardless of the specifics of the case, and there were many, what mattered most was how well her story aligned with the narrative.

Even George Floyd, who died with fentanyl in his system and had a long criminal history, was made into a martyr. His name became a password to elite approval. His funeral was televised like that of a head of state. And his death unleashed the largest protest movement in American history, one that caused over $2 billion in damage, injured thousands of officers, and led to dozens of additional deaths.

All in the name of “justice.”

But Iryna got no such campaign.
Why?

Because, in the eyes of many on the left, justice is not about fairness. It is about function. It is a political tool, not a moral standard.

• You will not see Iryna’s name on the back of a WNBA warm-up shirt.

• You will not hear chants of “Say Her Name” on the floor of the House of Representatives.

• You will not find grants being issued in her honor by activist coalitions or donors.

And if you raise the issue?
You’ll be accused of “politicizing tragedy.”

That accusation, too, is selectively deployed.

The murder of Matthew Shepard, a white gay man, became the centerpiece for hate crime legislation. Politicians marched. Hollywood produced films. Activists rewrote the law.
Yet when Tony Timpa, a white man suffering a mental health crisis, was killed by police officers who knelt on him for over 14 minutes, longer than George Floyd, there was no movement, no mural, no media frenzy. Why?
Because there was no political gain.

According to a 2022 Pew Research Center report, media coverage of police use of force is overwhelmingly focused on incidents involving Black victims. Pew found that 68 percent of stories in major outlets between 2015 and 2021 focused on Black individuals, even though they represented roughly 25 percent of those shot and killed by police. White victims, who account for more than half of all fatal encounters, were routinely ignored.

This is not journalism. It is activism disguised as reporting.
It is a principle only when convenient and silent when it is not.

Iryna’s death should have prompted real reflection about the cost of compassion without accountability. But in the progressive worldview, admitting that their policies led to her death would be heresy. So they retreat to what they know: curated outrage, selective empathy, performative concern.

The rest gets swept under the rug.

If your compassion is limited to those who validate your worldview, then it is not compassion.
If your pursuit of justice stops where political risk begins, then it is not justice.

It is marketing.
And Iryna’s blood does not sell the product.

This Was Not Hidden. They Just Didn’t Want to See It

There was no lack of evidence.
There was no ambiguity about what happened.
This was not an off-camera allegation, a confusing scene, or a case where facts were slow to emerge.

It was recorded.
It was timestamped.
It was witnessed.
And it was released.

The Charlotte Area Transit System published surveillance footage showing the moments before and after the stabbing. The attack itself, while edited for sensitivity, was clearly implied by the sudden movement, the suspect’s calm exit, and the trail of blood left behind. Local media covered it. Conservative outlets amplified it. The New York Post ran it. Fox News ran it. WBTV and WSOC reported it in detail.

And yet the national liberal press, CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, NPR, The New York Times had virtually nothing to say.

This was not buried because it was unclear. It was buried because it was inconvenient.

When the media wants a story to dominate the national consciousness, they make sure it does.

• They elevated the Jussie Smollett hoax for weeks before a single fact was confirmed.

• They covered George Floyd’s death with a level of saturation that rivaled 9/11.

• They transformed Breonna Taylor into a household name based on a distorted narrative that was ultimately dismantled by bodycam footage and court documents.

But Iryna Zarutska?
Nothing.
No headlines on CNN.com.
No “Breaking News” banners.
No MSNBC panels on transit safety or urban decay.
No New York Times op-ed on the failure of compassion.

Just silence.

According to the Media Research Center, coverage of racially charged police incidents involving Black victims receives ten times more airtime on major networks than similar incidents involving White victims. The center’s 2022 analysis found that when the races are reversed, a Black perpetrator and a White victim, the story is often “minimized, localized, or entirely omitted.”

The data from Pew Research backs this up. Their report from 2022 showed that 68 percent of stories about police shootings focused on Black victims, even though FBI data shows that White individuals account for over 55 percent of police shooting fatalities in the United States. The disparity is not in the body count. It is in the narrative value.

The Washington Free Beacon found that in 2021, The New York Times wrote over 500 articles involving George Floyd's name in the year following his death.
Iryna Zarutska's name?
Not a single feature. Not even a passing mention.

Meanwhile, outlets like The Guardian, Slate, and Vox, which routinely publish articles on refugee protection, immigrant rights, and the moral imperative of safe haven, had absolutely nothing to say when a Ukrainian refugee was murdered on a U.S. train by a violent man failed by the exact policies those outlets defend.

Even fact-checking outlets remained quiet. No Snopes. No PolitiFact. No “What We Know So Far” features. No “Here’s What Really Happened” explainers. Because there was no incentive to explain what everyone already knew, a white refugee, killed on public transit, by a protected class of criminal, in a Democrat-run city.

They saw it.
They just didn’t want to see it.

Because to acknowledge it would mean confronting the reality that soft-on-crime policies, bail reform, transit neglect, and mental health diversion, all marketed as enlightened, can and do end with innocent people bleeding out on train floors.

It would mean admitting that their worldview is not cost-free.
And that some people, like Iryna, are the ones paying the price.

So they chose silence, not out of ignorance, but out of calculation.
Because once again, the truth was not useful.
And in today's media ecosystem, the truth that cannot be weaponized is the truth that gets ignored.

Selective Compassion Is Not Compassion

If compassion is only extended to those who fit a narrative, then it is not compassion.
It is favoritism in moral clothing.

The same people who flood the streets over one death fall silent over another. Not because one is more tragic than the other, but because one can be used and the other must be ignored.

We are told this is empathy.
But empathy that requires selective blindness is not moral. It is political strategy.

Look at the numbers.
According to the FBI’s 2022 Uniform Crime Report, there were over 750,000 aggravated assaults in the United States. A significant portion of them were committed by repeat offenders who had previously been released under the very “criminal justice reform” initiatives promoted by the left.

In cities like San Francisco, New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, all run by Democrat majorities, repeat offender crime is surging.
In San Francisco, over 30 percent of serious crimes in 2023 were committed by individuals with prior arrests and pending charges.
In New York, under bail reform laws implemented in 2020, nearly 40 percent of people arrested for violent felonies were re-arrested within a year.

And yet, the public is told that enforcement is the problem.
That the system is racist. That decarceration is the goal. That reducing sentences and limiting prosecution is compassionate.

But where is the compassion for the next victim?

When a homeless man with a violent record kills a Ukrainian woman on a train, we are told to look away because the killer is a product of failed systems, of poverty, of mental illness.
When that same logic leads to repeat victimization, the data is ignored.
The victim disappears.
The principle folds.

This is not hypothetical. It is routine.

• When Kaylin Gillis, a 20-year-old white woman, was shot and killed in upstate New York for pulling into the wrong driveway, President Biden said nothing. The media offered only passing coverage.

• When Cannon Hinnant, a 5-year-old white boy, was shot in the head by a Black neighbor in North Carolina while riding his bike, there were no national marches. No celebrity fundraisers. No murals.

• When Justine Damond, a white woman from Australia, was shot and killed by a Somali-American police officer in Minneapolis, there were no protests, no riots, no national movement. Her killer, Mohamed Noor, was sentenced and then quietly released early.

These were not minor incidents. They were brutal and senseless.
But they did not serve the narrative.

In contrast, George Floyd became a secular saint. Statues were erected. Entire government programs were renamed. Streets were painted with his name.
This, despite the fact that Floyd had a violent criminal history, including armed robbery, and had ingested a fatal combination of fentanyl and methamphetamine at the time of his arrest.

The facts didn’t matter. The symbol did.

What does it say about a society when a violent criminal gets a funeral on television, but a quiet refugee stabbed on a train gets nothing?

This is not about race. It is about utility.
Who can be used to push an agenda, and who cannot.

That is the calculus.

Selective compassion is not the result of ignorance. It is the result of priorities.
And the priorities are clear: elevate any case that justifies the policies of the left, and bury any case that indicts them.

The entire concept of justice becomes warped.
Justice for some. Silence for others.
Visibility only when it’s useful.
Empathy only when it’s convenient.

This is not morality. This is marketing. And if the price is a woman like Iryna Zarutska, so be it. She simply did not fit the script.

Black Hypocrisy and the Outrage Filter

You already know how this goes.

Say anything about the race of the killer in this case and suddenly, you’re the one under fire. Not the guy with the knife. Not the system that let him back out on the street. You.

Because the man who stabbed Iryna Zarutska wasn’t just a criminal. He was a Black, homeless, mentally unstable repeat offender and pointing that out is breaking some kind of unwritten rule.

But let’s just say what everyone’s thinking:

A whole lot of people calling this article “racist” wouldn’t want that man near their apartment, their kids, or their neighborhood either.
They just don’t want anyone saying it out loud.

When It’s in Your Neighborhood, It’s Different

Go ahead and try building a homeless shelter in a Black neighborhood.
See who protests first.

It’s not White conservatives. It’s Black residents.

Because they’ve seen what happens. They know what follows.
They don’t want unstable men pacing around outside the liquor store. They don’t want needles in the park. They don’t want the “compassion” of white liberals getting people killed in their zip code.

In Atlanta, a plan to open a 24-hour homeless service center on the south side was met with outrage, and not from Republicans. From Black families who’d lived there for decades.

In Chicago, Lori Lightfoot tried to move migrants into Black neighborhoods. The community revolted. Not because they’re anti-immigrant. Because they were already dealing with crumbling schools, high crime, and broken promises. And now this?

These folks knew what time it was.
They just weren’t supposed to say it.

The Stats Are Real. The Silence Is Political.

According to the DOJ’s 2018 crime report:

• Black offenders committed over 547,000 violent crimes against White victims.

• White offenders committed fewer than 60,000 against Black victims.

That’s almost a 10-to-1 ratio.

That’s not a conspiracy. That’s a government number.

But say it out loud and you’re suddenly a White nationalist. A bigot. A threat.

The numbers are real. But acknowledging them is not allowed.

Because if people started asking why that ratio exists, they might start asking who’s benefitting from all the silence.

If the Races Were Reversed…

Let’s stop pretending.

If a White man stabbed a Black refugee mother to death on a train, you’d never hear the end of it.

CNN would be on the scene.
Zelensky would send a statement.
The DNC would have a hashtag and a t-shirt printed before the body hit the floor.

But this?
White victim. Black killer. Liberal city. Democrat policies.

Nothing.
Silence.

Because nothing kills a good narrative like the truth showing up with a knife.

So Let’s Be Clear

This isn’t about blaming all Black people.
It’s about calling out the ones who cry racism when anyone questions the system, then quietly move out of the neighborhoods that system destroys.

It’s about asking why we can’t talk honestly about crime without getting labeled.
And why the people most protected by this culture of silence are often the most dangerous.

So no, this isn’t racism.
This is reality.

And if it makes you uncomfortable, that says more about you than it does about me.

“Nothing is easier than to get peaceful people to renounce violence, even when they provide no concrete ways to prevent violence from others.”
— Thomas Sowell

A System Designed to Fail

Failures are tragic.
But repeated, predictable failures are something else entirely, they are policy.

The man who stabbed Iryna Zarutska to death on a Charlotte train was not an anomaly. He was the product of a system carefully reshaped over the past decade, not by accident, but by design.

Across major U.S. cities, progressive prosecutors and politicians have pushed a theory: that enforcement is oppressive, punishment is unjust, and accountability is optional.

In practice, this has created revolving-door courts, abandoned mental health systems, and a transit environment that doubles as a shelter, an asylum, and a hunting ground.

According to a 2023 study by the Manhattan Institute:

• In cities where bail reform was implemented, rearrest rates increased by 11 to 20 percent, especially among violent offenders.

• In New York City, between 2020 and 2022, nearly one in five people released without bail for violent felonies were rearrested for new violent crimes.

Charlotte, where Iryna was murdered, follows a similar model:

• Mecklenburg County D.A. Spencer Merriweather has championed “restorative justice” and alternatives to incarceration.

• Police staffing levels are down, while violent crime has risen steadily since 2018, especially on the city’s transit system.

• A 2022 WBTV investigation found that CATS had no full-time transit police assigned to trains after 11 PM, despite repeated violent incidents.

These are not isolated failures, they are part of a national pattern.

Baltimore

In 2021, then-State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby announced her office would no longer prosecute so-called “quality of life crimes,” including drug possession, prostitution, and minor theft.
The result?

• Baltimore’s homicide rate has remained one of the highest in the country, hovering around 55 homicides per 100,000 people, over 10 times the national average.

• In 2023, the city hit its 300th homicide for the ninth year in a row.

• The public transit system has become a hotspot for assaults and robberies, with security gaps routinely exposed.

Despite this, Baltimore rejected assistance. In 2023, the city turned down a federally funded public safety grant aimed at improving technology and law enforcement coordination, citing “community trust concerns.”

Washington, D.C.

The nation’s capital slashed its police budget in 2020 and reduced enforcement of fare evasion and loitering on its Metro system.

• By 2023, D.C. experienced its highest homicide rate in over 25 years.

• Carjackings tripled. Many involved teenagers, repeat offenders, or both.

• WMATA (the D.C. transit authority) saw a 200% spike in violent crime year-over-year, prompting a reluctant reversal on police presence by mid-2024.

And yet, D.C. Council members blocked efforts to reinstate stricter sentencing and rejected federal oversight proposals, calling them “colonialist” and “undemocratic.”

Chicago

Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx implemented wide-scale decarceration policies:

• Felony retail theft charges were raised to $1,000 minimums.

• Gun possession cases were often dismissed.

• Low-level drug and property crimes were deprioritized.

The effect?

• Chicago’s violent crime rate remains 3x the national average.

• Over 80 people were shot over the 2023 Fourth of July weekend alone.

• CTA (Chicago Transit Authority) has reported rising assaults, stabbings, and robberies, often perpetrated by individuals with long criminal histories.

Despite rising public pressure, city leaders have called for more funding to social programs, not more enforcement, and continue to describe the violence as a “complex public health issue,” not a criminal crisis.

Los Angeles

Los Angeles has become a case study in policy-induced chaos:

• District Attorney George Gascón banned sentencing enhancements for repeat offenders, dismantled gang units, and reduced prosecution of juvenile criminals.

• The LA Metro saw a 24% increase in violent crime from 2022 to 2023, with stabbings, beatings, and drug overdoses becoming routine.

• A 2023 audit found that Metro’s private security failed to intervene in over 70% of serious incidents.

And despite soaring crime, city leaders voted in 2024 to replace more armed officers with “community ambassadors” on the trains.

Charlotte Chose This

The tragedy that unfolded on a Charlotte train was not the result of a single man’s madness.
It was the consequence of a series of deliberate choices, made by elected leaders, enforced by bureaucrats, and justified by ideology.

Charlotte is a Democrat-run city. Its mayor, Vi Lyles, has held office since 2017. Its City Council leans entirely left. The District Attorney, Spencer Merriweather, is a progressive prosecutor aligned with the so-called “reform” movement.

And together, they built the conditions that allowed this to happen.

Policing Was Dismantled on Purpose

In 2020, Charlotte leadership followed the national trend: freeze police budgets, reallocate funds, and declare enforcement “harmful.”

They cut training programs. They delayed recruitment. They diverted funding to social initiatives.
By 2023, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department was short by hundreds of officers, and patrol coverage across the city, especially around transit hubs, was stretched thin.

Mayor Lyles publicly supported these reforms as part of a “new vision for public safety.”

That vision had no place for cops on trains.

Transit Security Was a Joke and Still Is

The CATS Blue Line, where Iryna was murdered, had become a magnet for criminal behavior: open drug use, assaults, stabbings, thefts.

And yet:

• There was no dedicated transit police force.

• There were no armed officers riding the trains.

• There was no live monitoring of security footage.

In fact, a 2022 investigation revealed that after 11 PM, there were zero full-time transit officers present anywhere on the system, even as violent incidents stacked up.

This wasn’t oversight. It was policy.

City leaders believed policing the trains would lead to “overcriminalization.”
So they left them unguarded.

Prosecutors Let Criminals Walk

Mecklenburg County D.A. Spencer Merriweather has championed “restorative justice”, often choosing diversion, leniency, or non-prosecution for repeat offenders, even in violent or high-risk cases.

The man who stabbed Iryna?
He had a criminal record.
He had encountered police before.
And yet, he was not in custody, not in treatment, not monitored in any meaningful way.

This was not a failure to act.
It was a decision not to act.

Data Was Hidden. Warnings Were Ignored.

Even after multiple high-profile assaults on the Blue Line, CATS refused to release surveillance video, citing vague legal concerns.
Public pressure mounted, but city leaders downplayed the crime problem, calling it “isolated” and “sensationalized.”

A 2023 internal audit showed CATS had underreported serious incidents and failed to follow through on basic security recommendations.

They knew.
They just didn’t care to fix it.

They Rejected Help and Called It Progress

Charlotte’s leadership has consistently refused federal law enforcement assistance.
They pushed to block cooperation with ICE and DHS, even when it involved violent offenders.
They declined to join DOJ-funded public safety partnerships.
They said they were building “community trust.”

In reality, they were building a vacuum.

This Wasn't Unpredictable. It Was Inevitable.

Iryna Zarutska didn’t fall through the cracks.

She was shoved through them by a system that was built to fail, and by leaders too busy posturing to notice the bodies piling up.

This wasn’t some rare exception. It was the logical outcome of years of policy decisions rooted in ideology instead of reality.

We’re told that bail reform is about fairness. That decarceration is about equity. That mental illness is a social justice issue, not a criminal one. But ideas have consequences. And in cities like Charlotte, those consequences show up in blood.

Look around.

• In New York, Jordan Neely terrorized train passengers for months before someone finally stopped him. The media turned him into a martyr.

• In Los Angeles, homeless encampments have turned entire neighborhoods into open-air psych wards, and violent crime has followed.

• In Chicago, repeat violent offenders are released under “restorative justice” programs and then show up in the next crime blotter before the ink dries.

• In Washington, D.C., Congress had to step in to stop a radical city council from gutting its own criminal code.

And now Charlotte.

Democrat-run. Soft on crime. A long list of warning signs.
And a woman who escaped Russian bombs only to be murdered on an American train.

Where are the candlelight vigils?
Where are the Instagram filters?
Where is the front-page coverage, the presidential statement, the roundtable on MSNBC?

There’s none of that. Because this crime cannot be politicized in the right direction. So it’s ignored.

And that silence isn't just cowardice. It's complicity.

Because every time a city chooses politics over public safety, every time a mayor refuses to clean up the streets for fear of offending someone, every time a D.A. turns justice into a social experiment, they are making it more likely that another innocent person will die.

The people running these cities didn’t make a mistake. They made a choice.

And Iryna Zarutska paid for it.

---

If This Hit a Nerve, Do Something About It

I don’t run ads. I don’t hide my work behind paywalls. I write for everyone, especially the people no one else dares to speak for.

But telling the truth comes at a cost. And we’re up against a system that has money, media, and momentum. What we have is honesty, grit, and readers like you.

If you believe this work matters, if you want it to keep going, this is your moment to step up:

• Become a Paid Subscriber: https://mrchr.is/help

• Join The Resistance Core (Founding Member): https://mrchr.is/resist

• Buy Me a Coffee: https://mrchr.is/give

• Give a Gift Subscription https://mrchrisarnell.com/gift

Every contribution counts. But if you’re in a position to give more, do it. That’s how we build something that lasts. That’s how we fight back.

Because the truth won’t survive unless we’re willing to fund it. And if we don’t speak it, no one will.